My dearest sent this to me (its a quote from somewhere, but that doesn't matter).
"If I never met you, I wouldn't like you. If I didn't like you, I wouldn't love you. If I didn't love you, I wouldn't miss you. But I did, I do, and I will."
:)
Well what do you know. Evidence isn't quite so straightforward as I thought it is. Its kinda difficult to grasp some concepts T-T...
And its only the 6th lecture in! Gah!
Plaintiffs are entitled to consider their own interests before determining how the defendant’s damages should be minimised,6 or, where relevant, how third party interests should be accommodated.7 They are under no obligation to injure themselves, nor their character, business, or property, to reduce the damages payable by the defendant.8 A plaintiff is not required to pursue uncertain claims or litigation against third parties,9 even where the defendant is prepared to indemnify the plaintiff.10 On the other hand, plaintiffs will generally be required to allow the defendant a reasonable time to repair the wrong,11 to accept an offer of help from the defendant,12 to avail themselves of compensation from sources other than the defendant,13 to negotiate a further contract with the defendant,14 and to accept an offer of alternative performance from the defendant.15 But the plaintiff will not be required to do these things if they would prejudice his or her rights16 or would otherwise be intolerable to the plaintiff because, for example, it would involve a lowering of status17 or the maintenance of a personal relationship that the plaintiff finds unacceptable.18 Well....hopefully. XD I might actually take this down after a week...I'm actually worried this might incur liability o_o.112. Test of reasonableness. The reasonableness of the plaintiff’s response to the defendant’s wrong in mitigation is a question of fact to be determined in the light of all the circumstances of the case.1 In commercial cases the “ordinary course of business” sets the standard of reasonableness, requiring the plaintiff to do no more than reasonable and prudent people would do ordinarily in the course of their business.2 In general, the standard of reasonableness is not set at a high level since the defendant is a wrongdoer.3 The plaintiff’s response to the defendant’s wrong is judged, not in hindsight, but according to the circumstances as they appeared at the time.4 When there are various alternatives open to a plaintiff, a reasonable choice of one alternative over another will not be held against a plaintiff if it is subsequently found that one of the other alternatives might have involved some greater mitigation of damages.5
Is it me? Or is she just so easy to listen to?
I can get bored of lets say Rihanna's voice in some songs, but her voice is really interesting. Not the best but very listenable :O.
© Blogger template Simple n' Sweet by Ourblogtemplates.com 2009
Back to TOP
